Hombre observando gansos
Fuente: https://harvardartmuseums.org/
leer en español
ler em português
The way we write speaks volumes about how we see the world. In East Asia, character-based writing systems have persisted for millennia despite modernization pressures. These ideographic scripts—where a single character can represent an entire concept—mirror the holistic thinking patterns documented by cross-cultural psychologists like Richard Nisbett.
When a Chinese reader encounters the character 森 (forest), they see three 木 (tree) symbols arranged together—context and relationship embedded in a single visual unit. This reflects a cognitive style that prioritizes connections between elements rather than isolated parts. The character itself teaches that a forest isn’t merely a collection of trees but a new entity emerging from their relationship.
Traditional Chinese writing flows vertically, columns progressing right-to-left across the page. Some scholars suggest this orientation echoes the apparent movement of the sun when facing north—a direction often preferred in regions where southern exposure brought harsh light and heat. The writing direction thus inscribes cosmic patterns into the very flow of thought.
Western alphabetic systems took a dramatically different approach. Breaking language into its smallest sonic components—meaningless in isolation but powerful in combination—alphabets reflect an analytical mindset that dissects complex wholes into fundamental parts. With just a handful of letters, Greeks, Romans, and their cultural descendants could construct any word through systematic recombination, much like modern building blocks.
This “Lego approach” to writing aligned perfectly with the Western intellectual tradition from Aristotle onward: classify, categorize, analyze parts before synthesizing understanding. The left-to-right flow of most Western scripts mirrors the sun’s journey when facing south, the preferred orientation in more temperate climates, determining even the orientation of houses.
Neither approach is inherently superior. Each writing system evolved to serve the cognitive patterns, linguistic needs, and environmental conditions of its culture. What emerges is a profound revelation: our most basic tools for recording thought aren’t merely practical inventions but expressions of how we fundamentally make sense of the world—encoded in every stroke, every letter, every line we write.
alfredobehrens@gmail.com